Can I Move With My Child?

September 8, 2014

People move or relocate all the time – sometimes for a job, sometimes to be closer to family, or sometimes just for a new start.  However, for separated or divorced parents who share custody of a child, a move is complicated.  The decision to relocate has an effect on your custody order and visitation schedule. In D.C., if you have joint custody, you have to seek permission before moving with the minor child.

The Court will consider the best interest of the child, and the factors under D.C. Code 16-914(a)(3).  However, when a request to relocate has been made, the Court will consider additional factors along with the factors listed in the D.C. Code.

The factors for a request to relocate are:

  1. The strength of the relationship of the child with each parent
  2. The individual resources, temperament, and special development needs of the child
  3. The psychological stability of the relocating parent and the parenting effectiveness of both parents
  4. The success of the current custody arrangement and the effect the proposed relocation will have on its stability and continuity
  5. The advantages and disadvantages of the proposed relocation, including the potential disruption of the child’s social and school life and a comparison of the educational, health, and extracurricular opportunities the child would have in each location
  6. Any benefits to the child likely to be derived from the parents’ improved circumstances
  7. The feasibility of an alternative visitation and access schedule, including the geographic proximity of and travel time between the parental homes and as this relates to the practical considerations of the child’s residential schedule
  8. The motivations of the parents in proposing and opposing relocation
  9. The effect the move will have on the child’s relationship with the non-custodial parent, and whether there is any established pattern of promoting or thwarting that relationship
  10. The extent of any conflict between the parents and the recentness of the marital separation

See generally Estopina v. O’Brian, 68 A.3d 790 (D.C. 2013).

 


Leave a Reply

Contact Khadilkar Law today for a consultation.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state. The content of this Website contains general information only. Khadilkar Law expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website.

Any information sent to Khadilkar Law by Internet e-mail or through the Website is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis. Transmission of information from this Website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the firm, nor is it intended to do so. The transmission of the Website, in part or in whole, and/or any communication with us via Internet e-mail through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between us and any recipients.

This Website and its contents are provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.