Parental Burnout

May 17, 2017


An interesting article on CNN:



No comments yet

Kentucky Judge Recuses Himself from Adoption Case

May 15, 2017


A judge in Kentucky has said he will recuse himself from adoption cases involving homosexual parties.  The judge stated that he will be doing so “as a matter of conscience” because he feels that under no circumstances would it serve the best interest of a child to be adopted by a same sex couple.

But does this violate ethics rules? Isn’t a judge sworn to uphold the laws of the land? If he cannot do so, how is he honoring his oath?  Interesting development in Kentucky – we will have to see how this plays out.

No comments yet

Judge Orders Custody to Three Parents

March 25, 2017


An unconventional family had a child and then became involved in a custody battle in New York.   The parties involved are: (1) a married couple, man and wife, and (2) their neighbor, a female.  The three were reportedly involved in intimate relations and considered themselves a family.

The neighbor female gave birth to a boy, whose biological father was the neighbor.  The married couple eventually filed for divorce, after the two women moved in together.

The Judge in New York awarded shared custody to all three parents.  To read more of this interesting story, click here.

No comments yet

Generous Family Law Leave in DC

November 30, 2016


I hope this passes and inspires other states.

No comments yet

Parental Rights for Rapists?

May 12, 2016


Rape victims who have gotten pregnant have had the heart wrenching decision to decide whether to seek an abortion or to have the child.  If a rape victim decides to have the baby, in some states, she may have to fight with the rapist for custody.

Last year, President Obama signed into law the Rape Survivor Child Custody Act.  This law provides grants to states that allow women to petition for termination of parental rights based on clear and convincing evidence that the child was conceived through rape.

Many states have laws that restrict or completely terminate parental rights of rapists.  According to Virginia Code 63.2-1233(6), consent of the rapist is not required in an adoption case, where parental rights are terminated. However, if the mother wishes to keep the child, the rapist has options to seek other parental rights.

In the District of Columbia, there are no restrictions of the parental rights of rapists.  In Maryland, the state Senate just rejected a bill that would terminate the parental rights of rapists.  The resistance stems from the right to have and raise a family, grounded in the Due Process Clause.

So generally in this region, women who choose to give birth to a child conceived from rape will be tied to the rapist forever.  What should be the law?

No comments yet

What Parents Need to Know When Kids Are on Social Media

March 1, 2016


From CNN:

No comments yet

Solo on Thanksgiving?

November 24, 2015


After a separation or divorce, many parents find themselves alone on Thanksgiving for the first time in a long time.  Here are some tips to cope:

No comments yet

Sharing a Mortgage During Divorce

November 4, 2015


An interesting article in the New York Times regarding shared mortgages: click here.

Both spouse’s names on the mortgage routinely provides complications in a divorce.  The article wisely advises to get started on the refinance sooner rather than later.  In many cases, the party wishing to stay in the residence will discover that they cannot afford it alone and the parties end up selling the house.

In other cases, where a refinance is possible, the paperwork takes longer than expected.  So the spouses may still be financially tied even after divorce.

It’s a difficult process that adds to the stress of the divorce.

No comments yet

Should Jail Be a Reason to “Pause” Child Support?

October 22, 2015


Fathers in prison facing high debt over child support will have the opportunity to “press pause” on their child support obligations.  According to the Washington Post, the Obama administration announced new adjustments that will allow fathers to label their incarceration as “involuntary” to avoid increasing arrears while they are in jail.

This program would allow a reduction for child support payments, that isn’t currently allowed in many states.  Many states consider prison voluntary, and thus it does not qualify as a reduction for child support.  The new program would not be carried out until 2017.

But many are asking – is this fair? Why should incarcerated fathers get a break on child support – at a cost to the taxpayer?  Why should the mother have to bear the financial burden on her own of raising the child? Supporters of the program argue that billing fathers while they are in prison does not do anything except dig them deeper into debt.  Many don’t even know that the debt is accumulating until they are released from prison – at which time the large amount owed forces them to go to the underground economy for money.

Is this a fair program?

No comments yet


August 24, 2015


For those who have not heard of it, DivorceHotel is a Netherlands based company for couples looking to have a vacation and divorce at the same time.  The general idea is that instead of worrying about a long drawn out divorce proceeding, couples come to the hotel for the weekend to get divorced, along with spa treatments.

The company partnered with New York resort Gideon Putnam Resort and Spa to open a United States location in September 2014.  The entire package includes separate rooms, a lawyer for each party, a mediator, and a welcome basket including red wine, sparkling water, chocolates, and an information packet.  Some sessions are timed with breaks for walks, massages, and time in the relaxation room.

The goal is to wrap up the process by Sunday and to leave with a binding agreement.  The divorce papers get finalized thereafter.  It’s an interesting process, but we’ll see how much traction it receives in the United States.

No comments yet

Contact Khadilkar Law today for a consultation.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state. The content of this Website contains general information only. Khadilkar Law expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website.

Any information sent to Khadilkar Law by Internet e-mail or through the Website is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis. Transmission of information from this Website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the firm, nor is it intended to do so. The transmission of the Website, in part or in whole, and/or any communication with us via Internet e-mail through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between us and any recipients.

This Website and its contents are provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.